TRAIN Seminar — Genesislab CAIO on Why Companies Lack Incentives to Invest in AI Trust

At the 2nd TRAIN seminar, Genesislab CAIO Yoo Dae-hoon argued that companies have no real business case for investing in AI trustworthiness today. His prescription runs in two directions at once: market conditions that make trust a differentiator, and law and regulation to set the floor.

Share
TRAIN Seminar — Genesislab CAIO on Why Companies Lack Incentives to Invest in AI Trust
Photo by Miguel Henriques / Unsplash

Source: Digital Chosun (디지틀조선일보) — AI Trust Is Said to Matter, But Companies Have No Reason to Act on It Original in Korean

Digital Chosun covered the 2nd TRAIN seminar, held October 30 at Entrevelle in Seoul’s Gangnam district. The theme of the session was data governance, and Genesislab CAIO Yoo Dae-hoon spoke on the panel.

Yoo opened by positioning the company: “We’re an HR-domain AI vendor, and we’ve treated AI trustworthiness and governance as first-class concerns from the start.” Then he named the operational gap: “Even people inside governance teams struggle to decide which systems and solutions to actually build.”

His prescription pointed in two directions at once — market and regulation. He argued that the industry needs to reach a state “where hitting a certain bar on AI trustworthiness and data governance is what makes a product sell,” and added: “I would also welcome law and regulation.”

The seminar also included Professor Yoon Geon of Hanshin University and Cheon Seon-il, Senior Researcher at ThinkforBL. Remarks from the other speakers and the full context of the session are available in the original article.

Read more

단일 LLM의 한계를 넘어서: Multi-Agent System은 왜 필요한가

단일 LLM의 한계를 넘어서: Multi-Agent System은 왜 필요한가

단일 LLM으로 복잡한 비즈니스 문제를 해결하는 접근은 현실에서 쉽게 한계에 부딪힌다. 이 글에서는 단일 프롬프트부터 멀티 에이전트 시스템에 이르기까지 AI 아키텍처의 발전 단계를 분석하고, 각 구조가 왜 실패하거나 부족했는지 그 이유를 짚는다. 그리고 그 흐름 속에서 도출되는 멀티 에이전트 스케일링 법칙이 B2B 플랫폼 설계에 어떤 시사점을 주는지 살펴본다.